but caving in to twitter mob? why is it bad to show your way of expressing art? game making is an artform whether its adult games or not, and they tried to cancel the game due to them not liking a futa being in the game? they should of just let the dev create there game and just keep to themselves, can easily play the game and ignore the h scenes with the futa if it was made how it was suppose to orignally made, but the cancel culture is to much these days, trying to force people to censesor or cancel ♥♥♥♥ they dont like its sad. Originally posted by frag2k4:Well I think its harsh calling Huniedev a coward, the issues on Twitter regarding this resulted in I believe a nervous breakdown that delayed the game further, at the end of the day having people threaten you with harm and trying to solve the problem as they did is hardly cowardice. So take the oversexualized futa term loaded with pure ♥♥♥♥ fantasies away and talk with more appropriate terms. Polly is a touchy subject and an important aspect in the game for obvious reasons, and for the same reasons she should be given some extra value. I know HP2 is a very sexual and porny game, but there is still some humanity in all the characters. I love futa very much myself but in Polly's context I find the term inappropriate. Lastly, I would not call Polly futa, I know it means hermaphrodite in Japanese. She is publicly and originally meant as a trans person, a pre-operation woman, so the censor is really up to you, on what you think of her and what you choose for her junk. But when we were given the option to decide her genitals, the censor is on us, the players. The easy option would have been to cut her out, to censor. When Polly was first introduced, some people wanted her to be removed and some wanted her in the game but did not want to have sex with her. Censoring would have been when people had asked for or the developer would have wanted to put a trans person in the game, but would not have done it because of outside pressure. There are equally loads of people who love and who hate ♥♥♥♥♥ in their porn games. I don't think it censoring when the player is given a choice, it's just not forcing the player to just one kind of experience and worldview. And when you have 2 more hints towards genitals (emojis + innie/outie), it gets pretty obvious. Yeah, junk's a pretty common term in English for genitals.
Oh! Nice! We got a trans character, cool!" At first I was confused too about "What's Polly?" "Junk? Innie or outie, aha, it must mean the look of a character's labia" "But wait, these emojis are for ♥♥♥♥♥ and ass.
I think the option at the starts was pretty obvious if you took 2 seconds to think. Got the impression you were serious and outright mad that there was an option not to have a ♥♥♥♥ in your face. This is more common in the western community. I follow hundreds of japanese Doujin artists with the most messed up fetishes you can imagine, and they never had a drama. I only have your version too, since as I said I myself think social interaction on these places is a waste of time, for what I know he might be a jerk and maybe he didn't treat his users well, don't know how someone gets threatened by adding or not adding a futanari character. I'm not gonna comment on the creator itself though, that would take so much time, but basically if he's that sensitive to others he should stay out of social media, and only post stuff related to advertising his games and avoid user interaction. He was treatened for adding a futanari? I mean I can understand 99% of Twitter users are mentally impaired, this is what keeps me away from any social media/comment section on any site, I try to hide from the truth that there's really people that retarded, some years ago I felt shattered thinking every piece of art and emotion we created will eventually be no more than dust, today I feel comforted thinking at least human stupidity will be gone too.